
Australia’s pension age is under review, with experts and labour advocates calling for reforms that would consider the impact of different careers on a worker’s ability to work until the official pension age. Proposals include staggered pension ages and occupation-based eligibility, aiming for greater fairness throughout retirement policy.
Why Reform is Needed
Research highlights that manual labourers face more physical wear and tear over their careers, making it difficult for them to continue working into their late 60s compared to those in less physically demanding roles. Despite Australia’s increase of the pension age from 65 to 67 in 2023, many workers are unable to remain in full-time employment due to health issues and age-related bias in the workplace.
Proposed Solutions
Experts propose reforms such as occupation-specific pension ages, allowing those in physically demanding jobs to retire earlier, and partial pensions for people who need to reduce their hours but aren’t ready for full retirement. Additional suggestions include expanded retraining programs and responsibilities for employers to support older employees, but many believe these solutions have limits due to the lasting effects of physical fatigue.
Broader Implications
Australia’s workforce and retirement are evolving, with longer life expectancies and changing job types shifting traditional retirement timelines. Other countries have gradually increased their pension age, but calls for reform in Australia focus on both policy and employer obligations, aiming to reduce future fiscal pressures and achieve a more equitable outcome for all retirees.
Key Voices
John Buchanan, of the University of Sydney’s Health and Work Research Network, argues that the social and economic capacity of Australia should enable earlier retirement for those whose jobs have left lasting impacts on their health, and advocates for employers to play a stronger role in supporting the transition to retirement.
Calls for pension reform in Australia reflect concerns about fairness and long-term wellbeing for those whose working lives have involved greater physical demands, suggesting that a more nuanced approach to retirement age could better serve the population.
Here’s another article about ‘Calls to lower Australia’s Pension Age‘ on ABC.net.au
Have your say, leave a comment on our facebook page.






